Sunday, April 7, 2013

Kodak HC-110 and Ilford Delta 100

This is my classic go-to recipe. Ilford Delta 100 is my favorite black and white portrait film that I've ever used, and may be my favorite black and white film in general, though I haven't yet tried shooting anything but portraits with it. Ilford Delta 100 was made to be a very fine-grained, "medium speed" film. I shoot as much of my digital photography as possible at ISO 100, so I'm very used to working with that ISO, and comfortable with the light conditions it's good for. I've been very pleased with the fine grain. To me it seems just as fine as Ilford PanF+, which is rated at 50 ISO. I liked the tone better than what I got out of Kodak TMAX 100, although my Pepsi-challenge between the two films was far from extensive, and I'm sure I'll revisit TMAX in the future.

HC-110 is my go-to developer because of its convenience. When I first started doing film photography a few years ago, it was the developer we had in the house. I haven't switched since I (even now) don't yet develop film in enough volume to make powder-based developers, like D-76 or Xtol very convenient. In fact, this is why I've selected Rodinal for my next developer to try out, among other reasons. HC-110's biggest pluses are simplicity of use (it's very easy to mix up just enough to develop one roll of 35mm film, and then throw it away when you're done with it), moderately fine grain and high sharpness, and good tonal range. It's a very good "all around" developer, and plays nicely with just about any film you can throw at it. It's also very flexible for playing around with different development times and dilutions, making it a favorite for Zone System enthusiasts. Ansel Adams himself reportedly used HC-110 a lot.

So my desire to try out other developers stems from curiosity a lot more than a lack of satisfaction with my current recipes. Who knows, maybe I'll like Rodinal better than HC-110?

Anyway, here are some photos I've done with this combo. Both of these were shot on 35mm film. I developed them at "N+0," which for the time being is exactly what the Massive Dev Chart says, so 6 minutes in Dilution B at 68°F.

Lauren

As you may have noticed, I took this in 2011. Shortly thereafter, I left on an LDS mission and was away from photography for two years. When I returned, I unfortunately wasn't able to find any of my negatives from before I left. So my memory is a little hazy, but I'm pretty sure I did a little bit of contrast control in Lightroom after I scanned this because the scan did not render what the negative had captured. I have since revised my scanning process, so all other photos on this blog will have that consistency. This is the odd one out.

Kaycie

This frame was actually pretty badly underexposed. I raised the shadow detail in Lightroom after scanning. The detail was there on the negative, and there in the scan since I scan in RAW, so it was a simple matter of bumping the curves a little so it wouldn't be rendered pure black on a monitor.

Here are 100% crops of the photos. Now to be fair... this isn't really fair. I'm putting it up because I figure I might as well, but I have used Lightroom to remove a lot of the grain since I don't usually like it in my portraits. That being said, I think the grain was largely untouched in some of the more "negative space" areas because of the Masking feature in Lightroom's noise reduction and sharpening. From now on, I'll be sure to make my 100% crops straight from the scan rather than applying noise reduction first.




So there you have it. Delta 100 and HC-110B. I'm sure this won't be the last entry I have covering this combination, since I have a shoot planned in a couple of days where I plan on shooting another roll of Delta 100 in 35mm, and one roll in 120. I will almost definitely develop as per usual so I can have a consistent "benchmark" set of scanned negatives. Later I will experiment more with push- and pull-processing.

To Get Started...

So during all those hours I spend reading about film online, I often do find sites and resources that are really useful. I wanted to quickly list a couple that I found pretty cool.

#1. FilmDev
FilmDev is a site that I found the other day. It's actually what gave me the idea for this site. Basically what FilmDev does is allow film photographers to easily upload and share their own recipes. It's done based off your Flickr photostream, which makes things really easy for those of us who are on Flickr. I've started using it already, and plan to continue.

#2. The Massive Dev Chart
Probably most film photographers know about this resource. But I figured I would throw it up here anyway. The Massive Dev Chart lists just about every film/developer combination known to man, and proper development times for standard, push, and pull processing for various formats of film. Keep in mind that this site is run by hundreds or thousands of users, so the times aren't technically scripture. But I've found that the times on this site are always a really good place to start when you're trying out a new film or developer, and you an adjust accordingly from there if you don't like your results.

Eventually I'll put up a "useful links" section on the side of the blog where I can add cool new sites as I find them.

Introduction

Hey everyone. My name is Andrew. I'm a photographer. Recently, I've been finding myself more and more engrossed in film photography. After talking to a lot of friends and family, and spending lots of hours doing research on the internet, I've discovered something:

Despite the wealth of information available on the internet about film and developer combinations, it's tough to find it all organized into one place in a way that's useful.

In addition, film and developer combinations are totally subjective. Certainly there are popular pairings that many photographers use, but there is no "best" combo for everything or everyone. Because of this, I've set out on a quest to test out all the film and developer combinations that are interesting to me.

As I go, I want to keep organized and documented results, and I decided to put them online so that the next poor film photographer who doesn't know where to start with his/her film and developer preferences can get an idea of what to expect by reading here.

Each post will have the recipe I used, the developing process, and perhaps most importantly, scanned negatives and 100% crops to see grain details so you can make decisions based on what you see, rather than confusing phrases like "higher acutance but muddy shadow details" that seem to run rampant throughout all the Google searches I've done.

Over time, I also plan to carefully keyword my posts to form sort of a database that will be easily searchable for those who already know what they would like to compare.